Dashboard > Garnet's Wiki > 2008 > August > 21 > Light reading that matters - Science vs. Evolution
  Garnet's Wiki Log In | Sign Up   View a printable version of the current page.  
 
Light reading that matters - Science vs. Evolution
   
Google
Added by Garnet R. Chaney, last edited by Garnet R. Chaney on Aug 24, 2008  (view change)
Labels: 

Intrigued?
Want to know more about the debate between science and evolution?
Then you will enjoy learning more in this book...
Science vs. Evolution

I am only to page 424 of the 900+ page paperback version "Evolution Handbook" of the hardback "Science vs. Evolution", but after selling many copies of the book, I decided to write the following review for Amazon.com:

Very comprehensive coverage of the doubts that evolutionists have about their theory

This is a large and thorough book. It has more material than the paperback version called "Evolution Handbook". I tell people that there are three really good reasons to read this book:

  1. It will help you appeciate the marvelousness of nature, and how intricately designed we, and all of life, are.
  2. You will discover a greater appreciation of the the Creator
  3. It will help you be keenly aware of the difference between observation ("this is a fossil") and interpretation ("it is blah-blah million years old"), and how evolutionist are always trying to fudge the line and slip their interpretations under the line as if they are facts.

The book covers every area of science related to evolution in easy to understand terms. Key to every section of every chapter are quotes from the evolutionists themselves laying out exactly what the holes and flaws are in their beloved theory. Only occassionally does the author make incredulous comments. After describing the "hopeful monster" theory of Goldschmidt, popularized by Gould as "punctuated equilibrbrium" or "quantum speciation" the author points out the holes, and asks "Is this science fiction, Greek myth, or Anderson's fairy tales?"

The author is happy to let the scientists speak for themselves about their doubts. And the majority of the scientists quoted are not known to have any belief in creationism, their names are marked with asterisk. For example: *Isaac Asimov, *Stephen Gould, *Niles Eldredg, *Goldschmidt, *Norman Macbeth, *John Gliedman.

The sources are quoted extensively, for example (*M. Keith and *G. Anderon, "Radiocarbon Dating: Fictitious Results with Mollusk Shells" in Science 141, 1963, p. 634.)

You really should buy a copy of this book for yourself, and one to give to a friend. At least give your friend a copy of the paperback Evolution Handbook, so you can read and discuss the book.

Amazon tags:

  • evolution, science, creation, creationsm, biology, geology, paleontology, physics, genetics, mutation, mutations, vance ferrell

Special offer on Amazon

Please visit my Amazon marketplace storefront and buy a copy Science vs. Evoluton from me. As a special bonus, I'm including two extra books free with each copy you buy:

  • Condition: New! With your purchase I'll include free paperback copy of Desire of Ages and a free copy of Evolution Handbook (paperback version) that you can share with a friend. All three books are new.

I hope to ship your order to you soon!

Science Vs. Evolution
Vance Ferrell



August 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

Interesting Reading Aug 22, 2008
Take a police of the police breaking the law, go to jail, do not pass go, do not collect 200 dollars

Powered by Atlassian Confluence, the Enterprise Wiki. (Version: 2.4.3 Build:#705 Mar 21, 2007) - Bug/feature request - Contact Administrators
Complete Wiki Notation Guide