Perhaps microscopic randomness is the key code that keeps man out of the creation business .. that due to his sin nature he cannot be accountable to. Is there a time when man starts to break this code? I believe we live in that time. Will God allow it? Or perhaps the better question is will man be his own undoing as he finds he cannot manage this "next" level of knowledge. Thus Truth (God) is automatically self protecting. Again - we must be able to be accountable to the knowledge we are given.

Yet do people apart from God not indicate that they would like to be not only random chance takers and thinkers in both their theory and behaviors of the creation, but that they would rather believe in a total counter intuitiveness that is part and parcel to liberal ideologies. They rebel to these obvious constraints and even to that randomness outside of which things get ugly quick and then when it does they blame the God they don't believe in..

Here we quickly get into a discussion on norms and the discussion comes full circle to belief and unbelief. I guess I tend to think that liberal Godless views are unintuitive ones and thus relegate randomness and chance to a moral code (law) as well.

Chance itself evil? No. Chance having a tendency to lean toward the chaotic and unconstrained and unGodly? Yes Well planned evil considers and pushes people towards random unintuitive thinking .. all while the evil planners stay well with in the bounds of the empirical to keep hold of the absolute powers that corrupt absolutely. I think that we are watching the unfolding of such things and I also think there is little distinction in moral and physical chance due to the fact that chance thinking tends to lead away from Godly norms.

We are living in a day when chance thinking has lead to there being nothing people will not try. A new deviance every day coming into the "norm" . And what a great chance for the devil that is!?

"Our brains aren't wired to understand randomness - theres even a huge
industry that takes advantage of peoples inability to deal with random
distributions. It's called gambling." Steven Levy